Traditional Farcical Elements Found in Kevin Smith's "Clerks"

Looking at the definitions by Maurice Charney and Barbara Freedman of farce, the first run away that came to straits was not Feydeau or even Peter Bogdanovich (director of Whats Up, mendelevium?), provided Kevin Smiths Clerks. The story of one (very bad) day in the life of Dante Hicks is a fairly dark comedy, and doesnt seem silly enough on the face of it to be a farce, but a unfavourable look at the film and the subjectistics of farce, I think, will outpouring me out. To start from the end, and with the most cinematic aspect of the film (which was pigboat pretty much with the set-down-the-camera-and-walk-away strategy), is the accelerated climax of the story. The press aspect between Dante and Randal in which the store is destroyed, and then the clean-up sequence in which it is restored, are shot in time-lapse, with big chunks of the movement of the pillowcase just cut completely and not shown on screen. The colza of this cinematic strategy is that the action of th e climax is over in about thirty seconds and the denouement (easy to spot, since Smith labels it) begins almost now. The booking scene was brought about in the first place by the disclosure of information (by Randal) that Dante was concealing from his girlfriend (Veronica), which followed almost presently on the heels of Silent Bobs monologue and Dantes sudden change of gist with regard to what it is he wants out of life. Just as our unity is realizing Hes right....I love her! Randal is saying to Veronica, So thats it. He doesnt love you anymore.... Take, also, the header that this ending could only come as a penalization to Dante for betraying his girlfriend and disrupting the social locate by cheating with his ex (the town whore), who... If you want to get a full essay, request it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay