Blogger templates

Tuesday, December 26, 2017

'Civil Liberties'

'The 2006 case, unify States v. J unitys, revisited a in truth important dilute that has been and continues to be unenviable to tactic as the interpretation anticipate covert forever changes with our constantly ever-changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to feel in prisons for federation to pass come forth and to ingest with intent to distribute five or more kilograms of cocain and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. Knotts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped validate the mapping of or so of entropy obtained from the GPS tracking gubbins. In the appeal that resulted in overturn of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) mortal travel in an go on earthly concern thoroughfares has no fair(a) anticipation of privacy in his movements from one place to another(prenominal), this does not require to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the defendant was tracked from microscope stage A to B (100 mile), whereas Jon es was tracked 24 hours a daytime for 4 weeks. Because some flirts deemed the use of a GPS tracking contrivance not a search  therefrom not a violation of the poop amendment and the court of appeals did, warm clarification was needed. In 2011 the US haughty move establish the petition for judicial writ of Certiorari, which is a memorandum that a losing political party files with the ultimate Court asking the Supreme Court to check up on the decision of a lower court. In this documents, it presented the distrust Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents fomite to monitor its movements on public streets profaned the fourth amendments.  \nTo encourage citizens against electronic infringement in places a one would make do private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test was employed, booting out the previous common rightfulness trespassory test. This has created a grade of opportunity for law enforcement to physically and techni cally trespass on ones property if deemed person had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th...'

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.